Critical Assessment of PAC & JPC
The
constitution of the two committees involves the selection of members amongst
the members of parliament in proportion to their representation in parliament.
The two committees have been given the power to adjudicate over many
substantial matters of public importance which includes the disposal of matter
of 2G scam by PAC and Ketan Parekh’s scam, Bofors scam, VVIP chopper gate scam,
soft drinks pesticides matter by jpc. Unsurprisingly, barring soft drinks
pesticides matter and VVIP chopper gate scam there had been no effective
adjudication over all the scams. The reason for the ineffective disposal lies
in the very fact that how one can pass a decision against himself.
Interestingly, if a judge is found to have an interest in the subject matter
then he is barred to adjudicate over the matter because of the principle of
natural justice which says that no one can be a judge in a his own case. It is
because the bias in such cases can be presumed. But unfortunately, this
principle does not apply in the case of adjudication by these committees. It is
very pertinent to note here that the proceedings of these two committees are
quasi-judicial and the principle of natural justice is very much applicable in
these cases as well. One more thing is required to be remembered here that the
composition of these committees also include the representation of allies which
are lending their support to the ruling party. It is hard to believe that they
would give their decision against the ruling party. So far as the contention is
concerned that the head of PAC is the leader of opposition it is to seen here
that the decision of these committees are decided by the plurality of votes
though he has been given the power of casting vote but it will remain a futile
exercise unless there is an equality of votes which is a fact far from
imagination. So a very radical change is required in the formation of these two
committees. As these committees decide the matters of public importance its
power must be handed over to the committee headed over by the members of
judiciary along with the persons of high integrity to be selected by a panel
comprised of Supreme Court judges.
Comments
Post a Comment