REGULATION OF ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION IN INDIA

By

Competition is engine of free and fair market economy. It is capable of bringing out best in human beings and also equally capable of bringing out darker side. Competition involves a process through which competitors compete with each other in order to sell their products to customers. They use various strategies to win customers such as introducing discounts, economies of scale which ultimately results in low cost and more profit. But some enterprises in order to gain more customers and profit indulge in bad practices such as cartel, abuse of dominant position etc. which result in breakdown of fair competition.
It also causes distortions in free and fair market conditions of the economy which harm the competitors as well as consumers. Thus there was a need to develop competition law which would regulate the market and help in prohibiting anti competitive practices and abuse of dominance in market.
Abuse of dominant position is causing an inevitable menace to market across the world. India also prohibits abuse of dominant position by enterprise or group of enterprise under section 4 of Competition Act 2002. The previous Act regarding competition law i.e. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, (“MRTP Act”) failed to control in light of emerging complex competition issues completely and hence replaced by present; The Competition Act, 2002 which is more in line with competition laws across the globe and is better suited to the liberalized economy with it focus being on promoting and maintaining competition as well as consumer welfare. The Act primarily aims at regulating three kinds of practices (i) preventing anti-competitive agreements, (ii) prohibiting abuse of dominant position by a market player through unfair or discriminatory prices or conditions and (iii) regulation of combinations and mergers in addition to protecting consumer’s interest, promoting competition and ensuring freedom of trade in Indian markets.
It is one of challenging areas of competition law since enterprises can achieve dominant position legitimately through innovation, superior production or greater entrepreneurial effort but afterwards misuse their position to distort competition and thus harm consumers.
For e.g. Dominant firms might indulge in predatory pricing which drives out other competitors out of the market as they are not able to sell in such low prices competitive environment. If this happens for short period, then it is acceptable; but in longer duration it harms the competition and is referred as abuse of dominant position for which there is prescribed civil penalties under the Act.
With increase in malpractices by competitors this Act also faced several issues and challenges and thus this Act also has turned futile especially in case of control of abuse of dominant position. Thus with  the increase of trend of cases and issues that arise before CCI; several loopholes are identified in Indian legal regime for controlling abuse of dominant position like the Act identifies the dominant position of enterprise to be studied within India and not globally as declared in Coal India case[1]. Thus not acknowledging imports as one competitive constraint in market. Moreover there is no definition of unfair and discriminatory pricing under the Act and most of courts decisions are based on same criteria without giving any definition to unfair and discriminatory pricing. There is also lack of collective dominance as said in case Royal Energy v IOCL[2] and lack of criminal penalties. These loopholes makes Act unsuitable to control abuse of dominant position and thus harmful effect are felt more powerfully even after making a provision for regulating such practices.
Thus there is need to study the several case laws under abuse of dominant position and accordingly identify the loopholes for proper control mechanism under the Act.

[1]Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd v Coal India Ltd and Ors
[2] Case.no.1/28(C-97/2009/DGIR);2012 CompLR

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher As: Critical Pedagogue

By
Education is not only a process of cognitive development. It is a process of overall development of the child. The whole teaching learning process consist with three important components i.e student, teacher and curriculum. In the process of curriculum construction, evaluation and feedbacks are an important aspect to redesign the curriculum. Evaluation cannot be made on the basis of academic achievement of the students. Teacher should play an important role in the construction of curriculum as well as transaction of curriculum. Thus there is a need that teacher should take initiative to evaluate the whole education system as a Critical pedagogue. It is an ability to evaluate our teaching and the practices prevailing in existing education system critically in relation to methods and practices adopted by the teacher to teach concern pedagogical subjects. Ira Shor defines “ Critical pedagogy is habits of thought, reading, writing and speaking which go beneath surface meaning, first impr...
Read more

ROLE CONFLICT PROBLEM AMONG WORKING WOMEN

By
Women of India have marked their significant presence in the world in various fields. They have been given the status of power and prestige in India.    Indian women has got much more significance in today’s developing times. Where until lately, they were shadowed by patriarchal dominance, the contemporary women in India have moved beyond all social boundaries to emerge as triumphant leaders of tomorrow. Not only has She taken up courageous roles in society, her own individuality as a ‘woman’ has now got an improvised meaning. The world has changed for females in India now. The daughters are pursuing successful ambitions in the male dominated corporate scenario and mothers are taking up flextime jobs to showcase their exceptional managerial talent. Today, our women have stepped out to become bread earners of the family. Although the trend is yet developing in India, The IT-BPO sector is becoming a female dominated industry in India with a significant number of capable a...
Read more

Rights and obligations of Issuer, Participant and Beneficial owner under the Depository Act, 1996

By
As per section 17 of depository Act the rights and obligations of the depositories, participants and the issuers whose securities are dealt with by a depository shall be specified by the regulations. Under the Depository Act, 1996 depository means a company formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and which has been granted a certificate of registration by SEBI under sub-section (1A) of Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ). (Section 2(1) (e)) Work of Depository- The word ‘depositary’ is defined as “the party of the institution (company) receiving a deposit. A depository holds securities (like shares, debentures, bonds, Government Securities, units etc.) of investors in electronic form. Besides holding securities, a depository also provides services related to transactions in securities. It acts as a trustee of the owner since the securities are entrusted with him in trust. He is also the agent of the owner of the securities. Thus...
Read more