Cooperative Federalism & River Water Disputes in India
Essence
of Cooperative federalism finds its place in most sacrosanct document i.e.
Constitution of India. It provides strong centre with working hands of states
well provided in Schedule-7. But when it comes to river water governance entire
fabric and setup of cooperative federalism finds conflicting notion, which
proves to be challenging factor particularly in matter of river water
governance. Today world’s most important demanding natural resources is fresh
river water which is in state of crisis and shortage due to impact of climate
change, so is the condition in India.
Today our most of the states and the central government are at
loggerhead with respect to issue of trans-state river water sharing. More than
20 rivers in India is meeting with conflicting situation with respect to use of
water.Through our constitution provides for special mechanism under Constitution
of India Article 262 to deal with the issue of water dispute. But lack of
proper mechanism and implementation and cooperation among states has created
dubious and disturbing situation which has created riot like situation in
several state. We can take the example of Cauveri
River Water Tribunal as well Satluj Yamuna Link Canal, case projecting interlinking of
rivers. These all cases present fatal picture of non cooperation among the
state and central government despite cooperative federalism mandate provided in
the constitution of India. Today government at central and state level are spending
crores of money on litigation involving question of water sharing
administration, which is affecting the health of common people and farmers of
india. As we all know that fresh water resources are limited in our country. We
need to address this problem because most of the rivers like Ganga, Yamuna , Narmada , Mahanadi , Krishna , Godavari these all river are
trans state sharing river which has to follow the principle of equitable
sharing and respecting the cause of upper and lower riparian state and basic
principles of river water sharing mechanism.
Case of Satluj –Yamuna link canal is
disaster for Indian cooperative federalism as in this case four state named Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan and Delhi (NC)are involved and signed an agreement to built a canal in order to reducing
water deficiency of Delhi and Rajasthan during summer and more than 200 Crores
of money has been spent and finally
Punjab unilaterally withdrawn the agreement asking to remove/shut the canal which cannot be done because more
than half of the work has already been done, even Supreme Court taking the
cognizance of the matter asked the states not to waste people’s money and
utilise the resources for the common benefit based on the principle of
cooperative federalism but states are reluctant to follow and satisfying their own political interest.
Till now despite Supreme Court interference no development has been made.
Same
is the condition with Cauvery river water dispute where after judgment there was
violence among the people of Tamil nadu and Karnatka because of non
satisfaction as it will affect the lives
of farmers and common people.
The above
mentioned case shows grim reality that how states and centre are behaving with
each other which is violation of constitutional mandate. So far as river water
governance is concerned despite having the laws there lies huge gap and drawback
in the laws relating to river -water sharing mechanism which requires quick
amendment in order to reduce the conflict among the states. Thus India is in
need of robust river water sharing laws which can benefit all the Indian states
and instead of becoming bone of
contention it must become life line of every Indians because without water no
one can survive.
Comments
Post a Comment