POSITIVITIES OF THE GST COUNCIL
It has just been a fortnight when
the President Pranab Mukherhee signed off on the 122nd Constitutional Amendment
Bill for the introduction of the Goods and services(GST) regime, work on the
next steps has begun. The GST Council is being led by the Union Finance
Minister and with representatives from all the States had its first meeting on
September 22-23, flagging off the process of determining the nitty-gritty of
the new indirect tax system and resolving differences on crucial
first-principle issues. Time is of the essence as just six months remain for
the April 1, 2017 deadline that the Centre has set for ringing in the GST.
Finance Minister, Arun Jaitley has admitted that the deadline is 'challenging',
but going by the outcomes of the first meeting of the Council, it is doable.
Apart from agreeing on the rules and timetable for its meetings, the Council
reached a consensus on the threshold turnover for a business to be covered by
the GST, Rs. 20 Lakh , which ensures that the new tax will not be a compliance
burden for small retailers and traders. It has also been agreed on the draft
compensation formula for States' revenue losses and accepted industry's
rationale to subsume myriad cess levies in the GST.
An important signal at this juncture
is the Centre's decision to let go of the Central Board of Excise and Custom's
proposal to create dual control over the assessment of businesses with an
annual turnover of up to Rs.1.5 crore and give States that power. Experts
reckon that a large number of assessees fall below this threshold. By conceding
ground on this contentious issue, the Finance Minister has sent a welcome
message of give-and-take. This is important, given the need to resolve more
tangled Centre-State tax issues on the Council's agenda quickly, if the model
laws for Central, State and integrated GST are to be ready for Parliament's
winter session. It is evident that all States participated with an open mind,
including West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, irrespective of their ratification
strategies for the Constitution amendments in their respective Assemblies. All
decisions were arrived at by consensus. The Centre and the States appear to be
informed by the roll-out experience of the Value-Added Tax regime, and the
States want to be on the same page through discussions and support one another
rather than get divided along regional or party lines. This bodes well for the
GST, where every decision has to be taken by the Council based on a majority
view: the States have two-thirds voting power and the Centre has one-third. It
is to be hoped that this accommodative spirit of cooperative federalism
prevails in future also.
Mrinal Abhinav
Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
JIMS Engineering Management Technical Campus
Mrinal Abhinav
Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
JIMS Engineering Management Technical Campus
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete